What a scary thought. So what would happen to the blue merles of the ACD which is the figure head of the breed?? It would take a lot more genetic research on behalf of all breeds to be able to lobby against merles in all breeds.
QUOTE
What is a concern is that, instead of trying to educate breeders how to manage a problem gene to their advantage,
This is what shoud be done and is not that hard as farmers and the ilk have been doing it for years with dogs and stock.
Care when selling any pup in of paramount importance, I know my mother ( who was a breeder) would always met any prospective buyers before the pups were born, if she decided against them, she just would not contact them once the litter was whelped. We are lucky in the fact that despite living in the "suburbs" , the owners of our dogs sire has known us for over a decade and helped us train x2 other working dogs...boredom is not an issue to our dogs. Over exposure to much and many..maybe
So, why would a club with no colour specification want to exclude merles? Is is a totally forgone conclusion that merles always carry the genes to cause some of the problems associated with it? And as Silohouette said,there is a need for breeder education...it is far too easy to match BOB to BIS ( in the realm of the show ring) without looking back too carefully at the pedigree and colours....many breeders do not realise that you look at the coat colour not the ribbon colour. Farmers, based breeding decisions for years on ability, colour, and ;even though it was not on a register, somewhere ,some one always knew the "pedigree" of a a good working dog!!!